Cast Your Vote And Opinion On The Moral Issues Of The Day

Gay Marriage?  Decency Standards? Is Torture OK? Reenact The Sedition Act? Negotiate With Terrorists?
Bush/Clinton Comparison? Forced Mental Screening?    
Spanish Agreement With Terrorists    

 
Negotiate With Terrorists?     Separate Search Page
or search above
Criteria For Moral Decision?
    You Can Help Write To Karl Loren Tables Of Contents
 

Group Obligations to You

Includes Obligations of the Nation to You

Last Edited:  May 20, 2008 6:25 AM

Does America Have An Obligation To Bring Freedom To  The World?08/01/2004"NFL teams are recruiting a new breed of criminal players, the likes of which should disturb all NFL fans," say the authors. "Gone are the good old days of NFL recruits having rap sheets detailing merely drunken brawls and vandalism. In are the days of lethal violence, rape, armed robbery home invasion, kidnapping, and drug dealing."
Home Page -- Obligation of Groups To You06/19/2004
Home Page -- Obligation of The Nation To You06/19/2004
International Citizens’ Body Calls for Action on Bering Sea Bottom Trawling06/19/2004Here is what purports to be a drastic transgression ON the entire universe of living creatures -- at least those in the sea. Stories such as these are usually 100% false propaganda, but on their face they represent a typical "obligation" toward you (and all others) of the oceans -- to survive for YOUR future.
Judge A Moral Decision?  Look For The Truth!06/19/2004Moral codes down through time have long taught us that you should not lie, that you should tell the truth. What is truth? What is a lie? WHEN should you tell the truth? Is there such a thing a a "small" "social lie?" Does telling the truth include being a witness on crimes you observe? To whom? What is REAL? These are not simple questions -- they call for some insight into these words and the philosophy of morals. How do you "build" a moral code? Is it just a compilation of what the common man thinks is "right" or "wrong?" Do we take a vote? Who does the compiling? How do you judge a "moral code?"
Negotiate With Terrorists?06/19/2004You can read the two news articles below and consider the moral question: Where does the rational "obligation" lay? With Jesse Jackson for offering to negotiate with the terrorists, or with President Bush who says we never negotiate with hostage-takers?
President Bush Vows To Fulfill The Nation's Obligation06/19/2004We're not leaving Iraq because of politics. We're standing firm on our word because it's right, and it's in the long-term interests of our countries that we stand firm. The President intends to fulfill the nation's obligations.
Should the Spanish Prime Minister Have "Kept His Word" -- Did He Have An Obligation To the Spanish Electorate -- To Cave In To Terrorists?  06/19/2004Incoming Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero on Thursday reaffirmed his vow to withdraw his country's troops from Iraq unless they come under UN command by June 30 when their mandate expires. "I will keep my word on the presence of Spanish troops in Iraq," said Zapatero, in allusion to his electoral promise to withdraw the troops if the UN does not take control of the country by June 30.
Spanish Withdrawal vs. US Stand Fast:  Cast Your Vote For The Moral Issue06/27/2004No matter how you might "define" the word "obligation" it is clear that one Prime Minister, on behalf of his nation, pledged support for the war on terrorism in Iraq. Then, the terrorists, clearly changed the minds of Spanish voters, to repudiate their pledge, and to promise to NOT fulfill that original obligation.
WSJ, April 15, 2004:  Gorelick's Wall06/19/2004You see, it is a question of morals and obligations. Here was Ms. Gorelick who wrote a secret memo when she was in a position of power -- as Deputy Attorney General during the Clinton Administration. That memo increased the difficulty of the sharing of information between the CIA and the FBI. One could say that "HERE" was one person who may well have personally, and deliberately, compromised the safety of the United States, and made the entire 9/11 disaster possible! Is this, or not, an issue of morals? Who is taking which side on this issue?
WSJ, April 15, 2004:  Medicare Math06/19/2004A program's financial imbalance can be neatly summarized in one number -- the amount of additional money in an interest-bearing account today that would be sufficient to plug all future shortfalls between its projected outlays and receipts. According to the Trustees' report, Medicare Part A -- which reimburses hospital services for retirees -- faces a financial imbalance of just under $22 trillion.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed by independent associates are not necessarily the views of The Way to Happiness Foundation International. Independent associates are responsible for their own content, including the truth and legality of the statements made, and represent that they have the legal right and authority to provide the content or graphics provided. The Way to Happiness Foundation International does not independently investigate the content an associate places on his or her webpage(s) or any other promotional materials, and it expressly disclaims liability for same.

This web site is Copyright © 2004 by Karl Loren.  Grateful acknowledgement is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of L. Ron Hubbard. Grateful acknowledgement is made to The Way to Happiness Foundation International for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of The Way to Happiness Foundation International. THE WAY TO HAPPINESS® and the ‘Road and Sun’ design are trademarks owned by L. Ron Hubbard Library in the USA and in other countries (trademark registrations issued and other registrations pending) and are used with permission.