Cast Your Vote And Opinion On The Moral Issues Of The Day
Gay Marriage?  Decency Standards? Is Torture OK? Reenact The Sedition Act? Negotiate With Terrorists?
Bush/Clinton Comparison? Forced Mental Screening?    
Spanish Agreement With Terrorists    

 
Negotiate With Terrorists?     Separate Search Page
or search above		 Criteria For Moral Decision?
    You Can Help Write To Karl Loren Tables Of Contents
 

Vote On The Sedition Act Re-Enactment

Click For Moral Decision Criteria

Do you think the Sedition Act should be re-enacted, in view of the dramatic change in the political climate -- with politicians calling the Commander In Chief a liar, traitor, etc., or is Freedom Of Speech the Trump Card?

History of The Sedition Act of 1798

ACLU:  War on Words:
Censorship in Times of Crisis

The Sedition Act of 1798

World War I and the Suppression of Dissent, Part 1

 World War I and the Suppression of Dissent, Part 2

Anti-war goons guilty of Sedition!

Note:  You are encouraged to use your "real email address."  If you do you will receive an acknowledgment from Karl Loren and MAY receive comments from others -- but if you prefer, leave your email address blank -- you will NOT then receive any acknowledgment.  Karl reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments.

  Your Name

Your eMail Address

In the old days politics did, indeed, stop at the water's edge.  The world today, however, is a global village with practically no distinction between internal and external policies -- involving both the economy, foreign affairs, military operations and other major areas.  We must maintain our democracy, as discordant that may seem, by allowing and encouraging political debate and free speech on every subject of vital importance to our security and freedom.

In today's international war on terrorism "intelligence" is the vital ingredient by which we can defend our security.  It is both impossible and impractical to "debate" foreign policy which is often based on secret intelligence and even secret diplomacy.  No rightfully aggressive candidate for the presidency can have access to the intelligence and private diplomacy that has been and is being currently used by the Commander In Chief who is currently responsible.

I don't care for either of the above two choices -- they are too extreme. I do not Wish To Vote on them, but am willing to give my opinion on this issue below.

 

    

 

See The Results of these Votes

You Can Do Something About This -- Click

 

 

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed by independent associates are not necessarily the views of The Way to Happiness Foundation International. Independent associates are responsible for their own content, including the truth and legality of the statements made, and represent that they have the legal right and authority to provide the content or graphics provided. The Way to Happiness Foundation International does not independently investigate the content an associate places on his or her webpage(s) or any other promotional materials, and it expressly disclaims liability for same.

This web site is Copyright © 2004 by Karl Loren.  Grateful acknowledgement is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of L. Ron Hubbard. Grateful acknowledgement is made to The Way to Happiness Foundation International for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of The Way to Happiness Foundation International. THE WAY TO HAPPINESS® and the ‘Road and Sun’ design are trademarks owned by L. Ron Hubbard Library in the USA and in other countries (trademark registrations issued and other registrations pending) and are used with permission.