Is It OK For The Government To Force Children To Receive Psychiatric Drugs?
Top
There has been a constant
pressure from "mental health groups" to use mental health techniques to
screen people for mental problems, including the screening of school
children for mental problems that might prevent them from succeeding in
school. When these mental health techniques are examined they have
always led to use of drugs such as Ritalin, or other psychiatric drugs.
In the final stages such "use" becomes mandatory -- or the parent is
considered guilty of child abuse.
The question is, is it
"right" for the government to be endorsing or even forcing such screening or
mental treatment on children? What is the obligation of a parent who
learns that HIS or HER child my be subjected to such screening, and that
such screening may lead to forced drugging with mood-altering drugs?
Recent studies are showing not only that these drugs lead to suicide, but
that the FDA has known this and hidden it from the public.
Is this enough to change
your mind about how you might vote this fall?
Return To
Top
Read Below Then Vote On The Issue

President George W. Bush established the
President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
NEW MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE
FORWARDS PSYCHIATRY'S BRAVE NEW WORLD TOTALITARIAN RULE TO DIAGNOSE AT WILL
President Bush's
Executive Order
Evidence
of a link between antidepressant drugs and suicidal
Final Report Executive
Summary
Attorney
general filed suit against GlaxoSmithKline
Forced Drugging Of Kids
Psychiatric Drugs Found In Drinking Water
Risks of
suicidal behavior in patients
John Kerry
On Mental Health
Return To
Top
Source
 |
|
| |

|
| |
한국어로
Korean Version |
President George W. Bush established
the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health in April 2002
as part of his commitment to eliminate inequality for Americans with
disabilities. The President directed the Commission to identify
policies that could be implemented by Federal, State and local
governments to maximize the utility of existing resources, improve
coordination of treatments and services, and promote successful
community integration for adults with a serious mental illness and
children with a serious emotional disturbance.
Return To Top
From June 2002 to April 2003, the 22
Commissioners met monthly to analyze the public and private mental
health systems, visit innovative model programs across the country and
hear testimony from the systems’ many stakeholders, including dozens
of consumers of mental health care, families, advocates, public and
private providers and administrators and mental health researchers.
The Commission received feedback, comments and suggestions from nearly
2,500 people from all 50 states via personal testimony, letters,
emails and a comment section on this website. In addition to public
comment, the Commission consulted with nationally recognized
professionals with expertise in diverse areas of mental health
policy. The Commission established 15 subcommittees to examine
specific aspects of mental health services and offer recommendations
for improvement. The
Commissioner page contains the Commission’s Membership
Roster and the
Subcommittee page displays the separate subcommittees and
their report summaries.
The Commission will submit the final report to
the President in May 2003, and the White House will, in turn, release
the report soon thereafter. Once released, you will be able to access
the final report on the "Reports"page of
this website. The Commission wishes to thank all those who
participated in this critical and historic effort. The final report
to the President offers a vision of hope and recovery for people with
a serious mental illness and their families. |
|
|
Return To
Top

A new Food and Drug
Administration analysis of clinical-trial data shows evidence of a
link between antidepressant drugs and suicidal tendencies among young
people. The finding is likely to reignite debate over the issue and
the agency's handling of it.
The new analysis,
which focused on 25 studies of nine drugs, found that children and
teenagers who took the medicines were more likely to have behavior or
thoughts that appeared suicidal, compared with those who got placebo
pills. When the analysis used a far broader category of incidents that
might possibly reflect suicidal intent -- some of them classified as
"not enough information" -- the young people who took the drugs were
twice as likely to engage in the behavior.
(source)
Return To
Top

Researchers at
the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program at Boston
University examined the risks of suicidal behavior in patients using
one of four antidepressants: fluoxetine (Prozac by brand name) and
paroxetine (or Paxil), which belong to the class of antidepressants
known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, and
dothiepin and amitriptyline, older antidepressants known as
tricyclics.
Using a database of
more than three million records of patients of general-practice
doctors in Britain, researchers compared 555 patients who had used one
of the drugs and had an episode of suicidal behavior with a control
group of 2,062 of similar age and gender who didn't develop suicidal
behavior. They found that patients were four times as likely to
exhibit suicidal behavior within nine days after beginning treatment
with a drug than they were after 90 days of treatment.
(source)
Return To
Top

BANGOR, Wales -- Irish
psychiatrist David Healy has spent years speaking out on
antidepressants, charging that in rare cases they can induce suicides.
Some drug-industry executives and academics have dismissed him as a
disgruntled kook. But Dr. Healy's campaign gained new momentum last
summer when Eliot Spitzer's office called.
Almost a year later,
Mr. Spitzer, the attorney general of New York, filed suit in New York
State Supreme Court against GlaxoSmithKline PLC, maker of the
antidepressant Paxil, accusing the company of hiding negative data and
exaggerating the effectiveness of the drug. Glaxo denies the
allegations about its top-selling antidepressant. Dr. Healy, a
controversial figure who has been studying antidepressants since the
1980s, obtained an internal GlaxoSmithKline memo that has now become a
centerpiece of Mr. Spitzer's lawsuit.
(source)
Return To
Top
John
Kerry:
There
is ample evidence that mental illness can be treated. Unfortunately,
those in need of treatment often do not seek it because they are
ashamed of their condition. Among our Medicare population, the
mentally ill face a double burden: not only must they overcome the
stigma about their illness, but once they seek treatment they must
pay one-half of the cost of care out of their own pocket. The
Medicare Mental Health Copayment Equity
Act will phase-down the 50 percent co-payment for
mental health care services to 20
percent over six years. By applying the same co-payment rate to
mental health services to which all
other outpatient services are subjected, the Medicare
Mental Health Copayment Equity Act will
bring parity to the Medicare program and improve access to care for
our senior and disabled beneficiaries who are living with mental
illness. I urge my colleagues to join with us to pass this critical
legislation. (Source:
John Kerry)
LONDON
(Reuters) - Traces of the anti-depressant Prozac have been found in
Britain's drinking water supply, setting off alarm bells with
environmentalists concerned about potentially toxic effects.
(source)
|
Source

|
NEW
MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE FORWARDS PSYCHIATRY'S BRAVE NEW
WORLD
TOTALITARIAN RULE TO DIAGNOSE AT WILL
Diagnostic "Screening"
Process is a Con-Game To Troll For New Patients
According to the
British Medical Journal, a sweeping U.S. mental health
initiative will be unveiled in July which proposes to screen
every man, woman and child in America for mental "illness."
The initiative was prompted by a March 2004 progress report
by The New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. President
George W. Bush appointed the commission to advise him on
ways of improving the mental health system. However,
psychiatric advice has grossly misled the President and the
American people.
Return To Top
The progress report, entitled the New
Freedom Initiative, has failed to advise the President on
the real crisis in mental health - the fraudulent premise
for screening for "mental illness" and the psychiatric
drugging of millions of Americans. Under the recommendations
psychiatrists and psychologists are seeking
government-sanctioned power to "screen" every child for
"mental illness" through public schools, and every adult
during general medical examinations. The "screening"
criteria is based on the American Psychiatric Association's
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders
(DSM), a diagnostic manual that international mental
health experts voted in 2000 to be one of the worst
psychiatric texts in the last millennium.
Return To Top
Additionally, such screening is being
recommended at a time when there is broad public concern
that many of the antidepressants being prescribed for
conditions in the DSM are under federal investigation
for causing suicidal reactions. The Commission's
campaign for national mental health "screening"—which will
result in millions more Americans being prescribed these
psychiatric drugs—is very alarming and merits close
inspection as to its motives.
Here are the facts:
• The New Freedom Commission on Mental
Health's report states that "mental illnesses are shockingly
common," but neglects to address or even mention the fact
that there is no medical or scientific means by which to
diagnose mental "illnesses." Psychiatrists and mental health
proponents promote psychiatric "disorders" as a disease, or
an illness that can be diagnosed in the same manner as real
physical illness. This is a fraud. There are no blood tests,
brain scans or chemical imbalance tests to validate any
mental disorder as an illness or "disease." With no
scientific/medical criteria to substantiate these claims,
anyone could be diagnosed as mentally ill based solely on a
checklist of behaviors.
• The Commission based its entire
findings on the definition of mental illness as defined by
psychiatry's billing bible, the DSM. The DSM
contains hundreds of psychiatric mental "disorders" which
are a list of behavioral symptoms that are literally
voted into existence and inserted into the DSM. Such
diagnoses include "Caffeine-Related Disorder," "Mathematics
Disorder," "Disorder of Written Expression," and the
all-encompassing "Phase of Life Problem." These "disorders"
are simply a classification of symptoms that are drastically
different from, and foreign to, anything in medicine.
Return To Top
• To give an example of this so-called
science, consider the following mental "disorder" taken
directly out of the DSM:
Billing Code Number 313.9
"Disorder of Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescents, Not
Otherwise Specified"
(The entire diagnostic criteria
listed in the DSM for this category is as follows)
"This category is a residual category
for disorders with onset in infancy, childhood, or
adolescents that do not meet criteria for any specific
disorder in the Classification."
Return To Top
• The methods of mental health
"screening" recommended by the New Freedom Commission are
lists of arbitrary questions based on this DSM. If
"sweeping mental health initiative" is implemented, millions
more Americans will certainly be diagnosed and drugged given
the subjective diagnoses.
• Antidepressants are currently under
federal investigation for causing suicidal reactions in
patients. Between 1995 and 1999, the use of antidepressants
for 7-to 12-year-olds increased 151% and 580% for children
under six, with some as young as five committing suicide.
• The New Freedom Commission is
blatantly promoting the coercive and manipulative tactics
that have led to millions of children being falsely labeled
with mental disorders in our public schools. Schools have
become mental health clinics where children are diagnosed
based on subjective questionnaires, instead of given proven
educational solutions. This fact was substantiated by a
report from the President's Commission on Excellence in
Special Education, which found that 2.4 million children had
been diagnosed with mental "disorders" and placed in Special
Education, when in fact these children had simply not
been taught to read.
• A parent being coerced through public
schools to drug their child has become so prevalent that the
U.S. House of Representatives passed the Child Medication
Safety Act in May 2003 to prevent schools from forcing
parents to drug their child as a condition of attending
school.
Return To Top
• Due to psychiatric influence, parents
have been reported to Child Protective Services and charged
with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a
psychiatric drug, such as those currently under
investigation for causing suicidal reactions. Parents
have been charged with "medical neglect" for refusing
psychiatric treatment—despite the fact that there is no
scientific proof that there is anything medically
wrong with the child.
• A recent report by Allen Jones, a
former investigator in the Pennsylvania Office of Inspector
General (OIG), Bureau of Special Investigations, condemns
the New Freedom Commission (NFC). The report states,
"Despite a nearly 500% increase in American children being
prescribed mental health drugs during the past 6 years, the
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health found that not
enough adolescents are benefiting from mental health
treatment. The NFC recommendations prominently call for
mandatory mental health screening for all high school
students, with follow-up 'treatment' as required—this
means more kids on mind-altering and potentially lethal
psychiatric drugs."
Return To Top
The proposed model for a psychiatric
"treatment" plan recommended by the New Freedom Commission
on Mental Health to be implemented on a nationwide basis is
the "Texas Medical Algorithm Project" (TMAP).
In an extensive report (http://psychrights.org/Drugs/AllenJonesTMAPJanuary20.pdf)
Allen Jones reports that TMAP was funded by many of the
manufacturers of the same antidepressant drugs that are
currently under federal investigation. Coincidentally, these
drugs are also the recommended "treatment." Also, some
members of the New Freedom Commission have served on
advisory boards for these same pharmaceutical companies,
while other members have direct ties to TMAP.
Return To Top
In describing TMAP, Jones states, "The
industry needed to create an aura of legitimacy and a body
of favorable data to advance its marketing aims."
"TMAP arose during a period of
decreased Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight and
vastly increased sophistication in pharmaceutical industry
marketing practices. These practices aggressively pursued
favorable public and professional 'opinion' through media
promotion, and biased reporting of drug trial results."
Jones estimates that if TMAP were
implemented nationwide, the annual costs to the Medicaid
programs would be approximately 3.7 billion dollars per year
to treat one psychiatric disorder alone. That is over
ten million dollars per day just in Medicaid
expenditures.
Return To Top
Summary:
The vested interests of psychiatrists,
psychologists and others involved in the President's New
Freedom Commission has resulted in a biased report to the
President, aimed solely at increasing their own reach into
society, and to support an existing multi billion dollar
mental health industry. Of the 22 members of the Commission,
13 are either on or have been on mental health boards or
associations which set mental health policy at the state or
federal level, 11 were associated in some way with the
implementation of the Texas Medical Algorithm Program (TMAP)
in their states, four are psychiatrists and three are
psychologists.
The
U.S. Government must not support mandatory mental health
screenings, or the increase of subjective psychiatric
diagnosis of Americans that then demand their taking
dangerous psychiatric drugs or undergoing other harmful
treatments.
In the 1950s, on the heels of the
McCarthy era, psychiatric vested interests introduced a
federal bill (H.R. 6376), which called for psychiatric
facilities to be built in Alaska. It would have empowered
any peace officer to involuntarily commit any individual,
anywhere in America, to this Alaskan psychiatric
institution—all without recourse. The person would then be
shipped off to Alaska for mandatory confinement and
"treatment." It was dubbed "The Siberia Bill" because if its
far reaching totalitarian powers.
The bill had already passed the House
of Representatives before the grassroots efforts of
thousands of alarmed citizens helped to defeat the bill in
the Senate.
Return To Top
Now Americans must again act to protect
their rights. Before it's too late. If this "sweeping mental
health initiative" occurs, it will be the first step towards
A Brave New World, where ultimate control would
belong to the mental health industry. Anyone could be
diagnosed as "mentally ill." Given the fact that there is no
medical or scientific proof needed to make a diagnosis, how
will anyone be able to prove that they aren't
"mentally ill" and don't need or want to be drugged?
The first step towards this Brave New
World is mandatory mental health screenings.
Once all Americans are "screened" it
won't be long before psychiatry demands mandatory drugging
for all their new "patients."
The Citizens Commission on Human Rights
is a mental health watchdog established by the Church of
Scientology in 1969 to investigate and expose psychiatric
violations of human rights.
For more information contact the
Citizens Commission on Human Rights at 800-869-2247.
To view CCHR's report on mental health
screening of teenagers,
click here. |
|
|
|
Source
Return To Top
Forced Drugging Of Kids
Forced Drugging of
Children - Parents may face jail over compulsory drug orders In the US
judges can constitutionally order controversial drugs to be given to a child
over the opposition of his parents. Parents are medicating their children
for fear of having them hauled away by Child Protective Services. In the UK
Parents of children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD) will face jail under proposals in the new Mental Health Bill if they
refuse to drug their children, a psychiatrist has warned.
Return To Top
FDA WARNING FUELS NEED
FOR FEDERAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST FORCED MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR PSYCHIATRIC
DRUGGING IN SCHOOLS
On Monday, March 22, 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a
public health advisory putting doctors on notice and to be vigilant for
signs of suicidality or worsening depression with the use of Selective
Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant drugs use. Patients,
families and other caregivers are also warned. The Citizens Commission on
Human Rights (CCHR), an international psychiatric watchdog group, says the
warning does not go far enough-the potential for antidepressants to cause
suicidal and self-injurious behavior has been established-the drugs should
not be prescribed to children at all.
Source
Return To
Top
Executive Summary
President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
|
Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America
|
Return To
Top
Executive Summary
Vision Statement
|
We envision a future when everyone
with a mental illness will recover, a future when mental illnesses can
be prevented or cured, a future when mental illnesses are detected
early, and a future when everyone with a mental illness at any stage
of life has access to effective treatment and supports - essentials
for living, working, learning, and participating fully in the
community. |

In February 2001, President George W.
Bush announced his New Freedom Initiative to promote increased access to
educational and employment opportunities for people with disabilities.
The Initiative also promotes increased access to assistive and
universally designed technologies and full access to community life. Not
since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - the landmark
legislation providing protections against discrimination - and the
Supreme Court's Olmstead v. L.C. decision, which affirmed the
right to live in community settings, has there been cause for such
promise and opportunity for full community participation for all people
with disabilities, including those with psychiatric disabilities.
Return
To Top
On April 29, 2002, the President
identified three obstacles preventing Americans with mental illnesses
from getting the excellent care they deserve:
-
Stigma that surrounds mental
illnesses,
-
Unfair treatment limitations and
financial requirements placed on mental health benefits in private
health insurance, and
-
The fragmented mental health
service delivery system.
Return
To Top
The President's New Freedom Commission
on Mental Health (called the Commission in this report) is a key
component of the New Freedom Initiative. The President launched the
Commission to address the problems in the current mental health service
delivery system that allow Americans to fall through the system's
cracks.
In his charge to the Commission, the
President directed its members to study the problems and gaps in the
mental health system and make concrete recommendations for immediate
improvements that the Federal government, State governments, local
agencies, as well as public and private health care providers, can
implement. Executive Order 13263 detailed the instructions to the
Commission. (See the Appendix.)
Return
To Top
The Commission's findings confirm that
there are unmet needs and that many barriers impede care for people with
mental illnesses. Mental illnesses are shockingly common; they affect
almost every American family. It can happen to a child,a a
brother, a grandparent, or a co-worker. It can happen to someone from
any background - African American, Alaska Native, Asian American,
Hispanic American, Native American, Pacific Islander, or White American.
It can occur at any stage of life, from childhood to old age. No
community is unaffected by mental illnesses; no school or workplace is
untouched.
In any given year, about 5% to 7% of
adults have a serious mental illness, according to several nationally
representative studies.1-3 A similar percentage of children -
about 5% to 9% - have a serious emotional disturbance. These figures
mean that millions of adults and children are disabled by mental
illnesses every year.1; 4
Return
To Top
President Bush said,
"... Americans must
understand and send this message: mental disability is not a scandal -
it is an illness. And like physical illness, it is treatable,
especially when the treatment comes early."
Over the years, science has broadened
our knowledge about mental health and illnesses, showing the potential
to improve the way in which mental health care is provided. The U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released Mental Health:
A Report of the Surgeon General,5 which reviewed
scientific advances in our understanding of mental health and mental
illnesses. However, despite substantial investments that have enormously
increased the scientific knowledge base and have led to developing many
effective treatments, many Americans are not benefiting from these
investments.6; 7
Far too often, treatments and services
that are based on rigorous clinical research languish for years rather
than being used effectively at the earliest opportunity. For instance,
according to the Institute of Medicine report, Crossing the Quality
Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, the lag between
discovering effective forms of treatment and incorporating them into
routine patient care is unnecessarily long, lasting about 15 to 20
years.8
Return
To Top
In its report, the Institute of
Medicine (IOM) described a strategy to improve the quality of health
care during the coming decade, including priority areas for refinement.9
These documents, along with other recent publications and research
findings, provide insight into the importance of mental heath,
particularly as it relates to overall health.
In this Final Report...
Return To Top
Adults with a
serious mental illness are persons
age 18 and over, who currently or at any time during the past year,
have had a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder of
sufficient duration to meet diagnostic criteria specified within
DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders)10,
that has resulted in functional impairmentb which
substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life
activities.
A serious emotional disturbance is
defined as a mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder of sufficient
duration to meet diagnostic criteria specified in the DSM-III-R that
results in functional impairment that substantially interferes with or
limits one or more major life activities in an individual up to 18
years of age. Examples of functional impairment that adversely affect
educational performance include an inability to learn that cannot be
explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors; an inability to
build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers
and teachers; inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal
circumstances; a general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression;
or a tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with
personal or school problems.11
|
Mental Illnesses Presents Serious Health Challenges
Mental illnesses rank first among
illnesses that cause disability in the United States, Canada, and
Western Europe.12 This serious public health challenge is
under-recognized as a public health burden. In addition, one of the most
distressing and preventable consequences of undiagnosed, untreated, or
under-treated mental illnesses is suicide. The World Health Organization
(WHO) recently reported that suicide worldwide causes more deaths every
year than homicide or war .13
In addition to the tragedy of lost
lives, mental illnesses come with a devastatingly high financial cost.
In the U.S., the annual economic, indirect cost of mental illnesses is
estimated to be $79 billion. Most of that amount - approximately $63
billion - reflects the loss of productivity as a result of illnesses.
But indirect costs also include almost $12 billion in mortality costs
(lost productivity resulting from premature death) and almost $4 billion
in productivity losses for incarcerated individuals and for the time of
those who provide family care.14
Return
To Top
In 1997, the latest year comparable
data are available, the United States spent more than $1 trillion on
health care, including almost $71 billion on treating mental illnesses.
Mental health expenditures are predominantly publicly funded at 57%,
compared to 46% of overall health care expenditures. Between 1987 and
1997, mental health spending did not keep pace with general health care
because of declines in private health spending under managed care and
cutbacks in hospital expenditures.15
In 1997, the United States spent more than $1 trillion on health care, including almost $71 billion on treating mental illnesses.
Return To
Top
The Current Mental Health System Is Complex
In its Interim Report to the
President, the Commission declared, "... the mental health delivery
system is fragmented and in disarray ... lead[ing] to unnecessary and
costly disability, homelessness, school failure and incarceration." The
report described the extent of unmet needs and barriers to care,
including:
-
Fragmentation and gaps in care for
children,
-
Fragmentation and gaps in care for
adults with serious mental illnesses,
-
High unemployment and disability
for people with serious mental illnesses,
-
Lack of care for older adults with
mental illnesses, and
-
Lack of national priority for
mental health and suicide prevention.
The Interim Report concluded
that the system is not oriented to the single most important goal of the
people it serves - the hope of recovery. State-of-the-art treatments,
based on decades of research, are not being transferred from research to
community settings. In many communities, access to quality care is poor,
resulting in wasted resources and lost opportunities for recovery. More
individuals could recover from even the most serious mental illnesses if
they had access in their communities to treatment and supports that are
tailored to their needs.
Return
To Top
The Commission recognizes that
thousands of dedicated, caring, skilled providers staff and manage the
service delivery system. The Commission does not attribute the
shortcomings and failings of the contemporary system to a lack of
professionalism or compassion of mental health care workers. Rather,
problems derive principally from the manner in which the Nation's
community-based mental health system has evolved over the past four to
five decades. In short, the Nation must replace unnecessary
institutional care with efficient, effective community services that
people can count on. It needs to integrate programs that are fragmented
across levels of government and among many agencies.
Return
To Top
Building on the research literature
and comments from more than 2,300 consumers,c family members,
providers, administrators, researchers, government officials, and others
who provided valuable insight into the way mental health care is
delivered, after its yearlong study, the Commission concludes that
traditional reform measures are not enough to meet the expectations of
consumers and families.
To improve access to quality care and
services, the Commission recommends fundamentally transforming how
mental health care is delivered in America. The goals of this
fundamental change are clear and align with the direction that the
President established.
To improve access to quality care and services, the Commission recommends fundamentally transforming how mental health care is delivered in America.
Return To
Top
The Goal of a Transformed System: Recovery
To achieve the promise of community
living for everyone, new service delivery patterns and incentives must
ensure that every American has easy and continuous access to the most
current treatments and best support services. Advances in research,
technology, and our understanding of how to treat mental illnesses
provide powerful means to transform the system. In a transformed system,
consumers and family members will have access to timely and accurate
information that promotes learning, self-monitoring, and accountability.
Health care providers will rely on up-to-date knowledge to provide
optimum care for the best outcomes.
Return
To Top
When a serious mental illness or a
serious emotional disturbance is first diagnosed, the health care
provider - in full partnership with consumers and families - will
develop an individualized plan of care for managing the illness. This
partnership of personalized care means basically choosing who,
what, and how appropriate health care will be provided:
-
Choosing which mental health care
professionals are on the team,
-
Sharing in decision making, and
-
Having the option to agree or
disagree with the treatment plan.
The highest quality of care and
information will be available to consumers and families, regardless of
their race, gender, ethnicity, language, age, or place of residence.
Because recovery will be the common, recognized outcome of mental health
services, the stigma surrounding mental illnesses will be reduced,
reinforcing the hope of recovery for every individual with a mental
illness.
In this Final Report...
Stigma
refers to a cluster of negative attitudes and beliefs that motivate
the general public to fear, reject, avoid, and discriminate against
people with mental illnesses. Stigma is widespread in the United
States and other Western nations.16 Stigma leads others to
avoid living, socializing, or working with, renting to, or employing
people with mental disorders - especially severe disorders, such as
schizophrenia. It leads to low self-esteem, isolation, and
hopelessness. It deters the public from seeking and wanting to pay for
care.5 Responding to stigma, people with mental health
problems internalize public attitudes and become so embarrassed or
ashamed that they often conceal symptoms and fail to seek treatment.
|
As more individuals seek help and
share their stories with friends and relatives, compassion will be the
response, not ridicule.
Return
To Top
Successfully transforming the mental
health service delivery system rests on two principles:
-
First,
services and treatments must be consumer and family centered, geared
to give consumers real and meaningful choices about treatment
options and providers - not oriented to the requirements of
bureaucracies.
-
Second, care must focus on
increasing consumers' ability to successfully cope with life's
challenges, on facilitating recovery, and on building resilience,
not just on managing symptoms.
Built around consumers' needs, the system must be seamless and
convenient.
Return To Top
In this Final Report...
Recovery
refers to the process in which people are able to live,
work, learn, and participate fully in their communities. For some
individuals, recovery is the ability to live a fulfilling and
productive life despite a disability. For others, recovery implies the
reduction or complete remission of symptoms. Science has shown that
having hope plays an integral role in an individual's recovery.
Resilience
means the personal and community qualities that enable
us to rebound from adversity, trauma, tragedy, threats, or other
stresses - and to go on with life with a sense of mastery, competence,
and hope. We now understand from research that resilience is fostered
by a positive childhood and includes positive individual traits, such
as optimism, good problem-solving skills, and treatments. Closely-knit
communities and neighborhoods are also resilient, providing supports
for their members.
|
Return
To Top
Transforming the system so that it
will be both consumer and family centered and recovery-oriented in its
care and services presents invigorating challenges. Incentives must
change to encourage continuous improvement in agencies that provide
care. New, relevant research findings must be systematically conveyed to
front-line providers so that they can be applied to practice quickly.
Innovative strategies must inform researchers of the unanswered
questions of consumers, families, and providers. Research and treatment
must recognize both the commonalities and the differences among
Americans and must offer approaches that are sensitive to our diversity.
Treatment and services that are based on proven effectiveness and
consumer preference - not just on tradition or outmoded regulations -
must be the basis for reimbursements.
Return
To Top
The Nation must invest in the
infrastructure to support emerging technologies and integrate them into
the system of care. This new technology will enable consumers to
collaborate with service providers, assume an active role in managing
their illnesses, and move more quickly toward recovery.
The Commission identified the
following six goals as the foundation for transforming mental health
care in America. The goals are intertwined. No single step can achieve
the fundamental restructuring that is needed to transform the mental
health care delivery system.
Return To
Top
Goals: In a transformed Mental Health System ...
|
Goal 1 |
|
|
Goal 2 |
|
|
Goal 3 |
|
|
Goal 4 |
Early Mental Health Screening,
Assessment, and Referral to Services Are Common Practice.
|
|
Goal 5 |
|
|
Goal 6 |
|
Achieving these goals will transform
mental health care in America.
The following section of this report
gives an overview of each goal of the transformed system, as well as the
Commission's recommendations for moving the Nation toward achieving it.
In the remainder of this report, the Commission discusses each goal in
depth, showcasing model programs to illustrate the goal in practice and
providing specific recommendations needed to transform the mental health
system in America.
Goal 1 - Americans Understand that Mental Health Is Essential to Overall Health
In a transformed mental health system,
Americans will seek mental health care when they need it - with the same
confidence that they seek treatment for other health problems. As a
Nation, we will take action to ensure our health and well being through
learning, self-monitoring, and accountability. We will continue to learn
how to achieve and sustain our mental health.
Return
To Top
The stigma that surrounds mental
illnesses and seeking care for mental illnesses will be reduced or
eliminated as a barrier. National education initiatives will shatter the
misconceptions about mental illnesses, thus helping more Americans
understand the facts and making them more willing to seek help for
mental health problems. Education campaigns will also target specific
audiences, including:
-
Rural Americans who may have had
little exposure to the mental health service system,
-
Racial and ethnic minority groups
who may hesitate to seek treatment in the current system, and
-
People whose primary language is
not English.
Return
To Top
When people have a personal
understanding of the facts, they will be less likely to stigmatize
mental illnesses and more likely to seek help for mental health
problems. The actions of reducing stigma, increasing awareness, and
encouraging treatment will create a positive cycle that leads to a
healthier population. As a Nation, we will also understand that good
mental health can have a positive impact on the course of other
illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes.
Improving services for individuals
with mental illnesses will require paying close attention to how mental
health care and general medical care systems work together. While mental
health and physical health are clearly connected, the transformed system
will provide collaborative care to bridge the gap that now exists.
Return
To Top
Effective mental health treatments
will be more readily available for most common mental disorders and will
be better used in primary care settings. Primary care providers will
have the necessary time, training, and resources to appropriately treat
mental health problems. Informed consumers of mental health service will
learn to recognize and identify their symptoms and will seek care
without the fear of being disrespected or stigmatized. Older adults,
children and adolescents, individuals from ethnic minority groups, and
uninsured or low-income patients who are treated in public health care
settings will receive care for mental disorders.
Understanding that mental health is essential to overall health is fundamental for establishing a health system that treats mental illnesses with the same urgency as it treats physical illnesses.
Return
To Top
The transformed mental health system
will rely on multiple sources of financing with the flexibility to pay
for effective mental health treatments and services. This is a basic
principle for a recovery-oriented system of care.
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes two recommendations:
1.1 Advance and implement a national
campaign to reduce the stigma of seeking care and a national strategy
for suicide prevention.
1.2 Address mental health with the same urgency as physical health.
Return To
Top
Goal 2 - Mental Health Care Is Consumer and Family Driven
In a transformed mental health system,
a diagnosis of a serious mental illness or a serious emotional
disturbance will set in motion a well-planned, coordinated array of
services and treatments defined in a single plan of care. This detailed
roadmap - a personalized, highly individualized health management
program - will help lead the way to appropriate treatment and supports
that are oriented toward recovery and resilience. Consumers, along with
service providers, will actively participate in designing and developing
the systems of care in which they are involved.
Return
To Top
An individualized plan of care will
give consumers, families of children with serious emotional
disturbances, clinicians, and other providers a valid opportunity to
construct and maintain meaningful, productive, and healing
relationships. Opportunities for updates - based on changing needs
across the stages of life and the requirement to review treatment plans
regularly - will be an integral part of the approach. The plan of care
will be at the core of the consumer-centered, recovery-oriented mental
health system. The plan will include treatment, supports, and other
assistance to enable consumers to better integrate into their
communities; it will allow consumers to realize improved mental health
and quality of life.
Return
To Top
In partnership with their health care
providers, consumers and families will play a larger role in managing
the funding for their services, treatments, and supports. Placing
financial support increasingly under the management of consumers and
families will enhance their choices. By allowing funding to follow
consumers, incentives will shift toward a system of learning,
self-monitoring, and accountability. This program design will give
people a vested economic interest in using resources wisely to obtain
and sustain recovery.
The transformed system will ensure
that needed resources are available to consumers and families. The
burden of coordinating care will rest on the system, not on the families
or consumers who are already struggling because of a serious illness.
Consumers' needs and preferences will drive the types and mix of
services provided, considering the gender, age, language, development,
and culture of consumers.
Return
To Top
The plan of care will be at the core of the consumer-centered, recovery-oriented mental health system.
To ensure that needed resources are
available to consumers and families in the transformed system, States
will develop a comprehensive mental health plan to outline
responsibility for coordinating and integrating programs. The State plan
will include consumers and families and will create a new partnership
among the Federal, State, and local governments. The plan will address
the full range of treatment and support service programs that mental
health consumers and families need.
Return
To Top
In exchange for this accountability,
States will have the flexibility to combine Federal, State, and local
resources in creative, innovative, and more efficient ways, overcoming
the bureaucratic boundaries between health care, employment supports,
housing, and the criminal justice systems.
Increased flexibility and stronger
accountability will expand the choices and the array of services and
supports available to attain the desired outcomes. Creative programs
will be developed to respond to the needs and preferences of consumers
and families, as reflected in their individualized plans of care.
Giving consumers the ability to
participate fully in their communities will require a few essentials:
-
Access to health care,
-
Gainful employment opportunities,
-
Adequate and affordable housing, and
-
The assurance of not being unjustly
incarcerated.
Strong leadership will need to:
-
Align existing programs to deliver
services effectively,
-
Remove disincentives to employment
(such as loss of financial benefits or having to choose between
employment and health care), and
-
Provide for a safe place to live.
Return
To Top
In this transformed system, consumers'
rights will be protected and enhanced. Implementing the 1999 Olmstead
v. L.C decision in all States will allow services to be delivered in
the most integrated setting possible - services in communities rather
than in institutions. And services will be readily available so that
consumers no longer face unemployment, homelessness, or incarceration
because of untreated mental illnesses.
No longer will parents forgo the
mental health services that their children desperately need. No longer
will loving, responsible American parents face the dilemma of trading
custody for care. Families will remain intact. Issues of custody will be
separated from issues of care.
In this transformed system, stigma and
discrimination against people with mental illnesses will not have an
impact on securing health care, productive employment, or safe housing.
Our society will not tolerate employment discrimination against people
with serious mental illnesses - in either the public or private sector.
Consumers' rights will be protected
concerning the use of seclusion and restraint. Seclusion and restraint
will be used only as safety interventions of last resort, not as
treatment interventions. Only licensed practitioners who are specially
trained and qualified to assess and monitor consumers' safety and the
significant medical and behavioral risks inherent in using seclusion and
restraint will be able to order these interventions.
Return
To Top
The hope and the opportunity to regain
control of their lives -often vital to recovery - will become real for
consumers and families. Consumers will play a significant role in
shifting the current system to a recovery-oriented one by participating
in planning, evaluation, research, training, and service delivery.
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes five recommendations:
2.1 Develop an individualized plan
of care for every adult with a serious mental illness and child with a
serious emotional disturbance.
Return To Top
2.2 Involve consumers and families
fully in orienting the mental health system toward recovery.
2.3 Align relevant Federal programs
to improve access and accountability for mental health services.
2.4 Create a Comprehensive State
Mental Health Plan.
2.5 Protect and enhance the rights
of people with mental illnesses.
Return To
Top
Goal 3 - Disparities in Mental Health Services Are Eliminated
In a transformed mental health system,
all Americans will share equally in the best available services and
outcomes, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or geographic location.
Mental health care will be highly personal, respecting and responding to
individual differences and backgrounds. The workforce will include
members of ethnic, cultural, and linguistic minorities who are trained
and employed as mental health service providers. People who live in
rural and remote geographic areas will have access to mental health
professionals and other needed resources. Advances in treatments will be
available in rural and less populated areas. Research and training will
continuously aid clinicians in understanding how to appropriately tailor
interventions to the needs of consumers, recognizing factors such as
age, gender, race, culture, ethnicity, and locale.
Services will be tailored for
culturally diverse populations and will provide access, enhanced
quality, and positive outcomes of care. American Indians, Alaska
Natives, African Americans, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, and
Hispanic Americans will not continue to bear a disproportionately high
burden of disability from mental health disorders.1 These
populations will have accessible, available mental health services. They
will receive the same high quality of care that all Americans receive.
To develop culturally competent treatments, services, care, and support,
mental health research will include these underserved populations. In
addition, providers will include individuals who share and respect the
beliefs, norms, values, and patterns of communication of culturally
diverse populations.
In rural and remote geographic areas,
service providers will be more readily available to help create a
consumer-centered system. Using such tools as videoconferencing and
telehealth, advances in treatments will be brought to rural and less
populated areas of the country. These technologies will be used to
provide care at the same time they break down the sense of isolation
often experienced by consumers.
Return
To Top
Mental health education and training
will be provided to general health care providers, emergency room staff,
and first responders, such as law enforcement personnel and emergency
medical technicians, to overcome the uneven geographic distribution of
psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychiatric social workers.
In a transformed mental health system, all Americans will share equally in the best available services and outcomes, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or geographic location.
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes two recommendations:
3.1 Improve access to quality care
that is culturally competent.
3.2 Improve access to quality care
in rural and geographically remote areas.
Return To
Top
Goal 4 - Early Mental Health Screening, Assessment, and Referral to Services Are Common Practice
In a transformed
mental health system, the early detection of mental health problems in
children and adults - through routine and comprehensive testing and
screening - will be an expected and typical occurrence. At the first
sign of difficulties, preventive interventions will be started to keep
problems from escalating. For example, a child whose serious emotional
disturbance is identified early will receive care, preventing the
potential onset of a co-occurring substance use disorder and breaking a
cycle that otherwise can lead to school failure and other problems.
Return
To Top
Quality screening and early
intervention will occur in both readily accessible, low-stigma settings,
such as primary health care facilities and schools, and in settings in
which a high level of risk exists for mental health problems, such as
criminal justice, juvenile justice, and child welfare systems. Both
children and adults will be screened for mental illnesses during their
routine physical exams.
For consumers of all ages, early
detection, assessment, and links with treatment and supports will help
prevent mental health problems from worsening. Service providers across
settings will also routinely screen for co-occurring mental illnesses
and substance use disorders. Early intervention and appropriate
treatment will also improve outcomes and reduce pain and suffering for
children and adults who have or who are at risk for co-occurring mental
and addictive disorders.
Early detection of mental disorders
will result in substantially shorter and less disabling courses of
impairment.
For consumers of all ages, early detection, assessment, and links with treatment and supports will help prevent mental health problems from worsening.
Return
To Top
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes four recommendations:
4.1 Promote the mental health of
young children.
4.2 Improve and expand school mental
health programs.
4.3 Screen for co-occurring mental
and substance use disorders and link with integrated treatment
strategies.
4.4 Screen for mental disorders in
primary health care, across the lifespan, and connect to treatment and
supports.
Return To
Top
Goal 5 - Excellent Mental Health Care Is Delivered and Research Is Accelerated
In a transformed mental health system,
consistent use of evidence-based, state-of-the art medications and
psychotherapies will be standard practice throughout the mental health
system. Science will inform the provision of services, and the
experience of service providers will guide future research. Every time
any American - whether a child or an adult, a member of a majority or a
minority, from an urban or rural area - comes into contact with the
mental health system, he or she will receive excellent care that is
consistent with our scientific understanding of what works. That care
will be delivered according to the consumer's individualized plan.
Return
To Top
Research has yielded important
advances in our knowledge of the brain and behavior, and helped develop
effective treatments and service delivery strategies for many mental
disorders. In a transformed system, research will be used to develop new
evidence-based practices to prevent and treat mental illnesses. These
discoveries will be immediately put into practice. Americans with mental
illnesses will fully benefit from the enormous increases in the
scientific knowledge base and the development of many effective
treatments.
Also benefiting from these
developments, the workforce will be trained to use the most advanced
tools for diagnosis and treatments. Translating research into practice
will include adequate training for front-line providers and
professionals, resulting in a workforce that is equipped to use the
latest breakthroughs in modern medicine. Research discoveries will
become routinely available at the community level. To realize the
possibilities of advances in treatment, and ultimately in prevention or
a cure, the Nation will continue to invest in research at all levels.
Return
To Top
Knowledge about evidence-based
practices (the range of treatments and services of well-documented
effectiveness), as well as emerging best practices (treatments and
services with a promising but less thoroughly documented evidentiary
base), will be widely circulated and used in a variety of mental health
specialties and in general health, school-based, and other settings.
Countless people with mental illnesses will benefit from improved
consumer outcomes including reduced symptoms, fewer and less severe side
effects, and improved functioning. The field of mental health will be
encouraged to expand its efforts to develop and test new treatments and
practices, to promote awareness of and improve training in
evidence-based practices, and to better finance those practices.
Research discoveries will become routinely available at the community level.
Return
To Top
The Nation will have a more effective
system to identify, disseminate, and apply proven treatments to mental
health care delivery. Research and education will play critical roles in
the transformed mental health system. Advanced treatments will be
available and adapted to individual preferences and needs, including
language and other ethnic and cultural considerations. Investments in
technology will also enable both consumers and providers to find the
most up-to-date resources and knowledge to provide optimum care for the
best outcomes. Studies will incorporate the unique needs of cultural,
ethnic, and linguistic minorities and will help ensure full access to
effective treatment for all Americans.
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes four recommendations:
Return To Top
5.1 Accelerate research to promote
recovery and resilience, and ultimately to cure and prevent mental
illnesses.
5.2 Advance evidence-based practices
using dissemination and demonstration projects and create a
public-private partnership to guide their implementation.
5.3 Improve and expand the workforce
providing evidence-based mental health services and supports.
5.4 Develop the knowledge base in
four understudied areas: mental health disparities, long-term effects
of medications, trauma, and acute care.
Return To
Top
Goal 6 - Technology Is Used to Access Mental Health Care and Information
In a transformed mental health system,
advanced communication and information technology will empower consumers
and families and will be a tool for providers to deliver the best care.
Consumers and families will be able to regularly communicate with the
agencies and personnel that deliver treatment and support services and
that are accountable for achieving the goals outlined in the individual
plan of care. Information about illnesses, effective treatments, and the
services in their community will be readily available to consumers and
families.
Return
To Top
Access to information will foster
continuous, caring relationships between consumers and providers by
providing a medical history, allowing for self-management of care, and
electronically linking multiple service systems. Providers will access
expert systems that bring to bear the most recent breakthroughs and
studies of optimal outcomes to facilitate the best care options. Having
agreed to use the same health messaging standards, pharmaceutical codes,
imaging standards, and laboratory test names, the Nation's health system
will be much closer to speaking a common language and providing superior
patient care. Informed consumers and providers will result in better
outcomes and will more efficiently use resources.
Return
To Top
Electronic health records can improve
quality by promoting adoption and adherence to evidence-based practices
through inclusion of clinical reminders, clinical practice guidelines,
tools for clinical decision support, computer order entry, and patient
safety alert systems. For example, prescription medications being taken
or specific drug allergies would be known, which could prevent serious
injury or death resulting from drug interactions, excessive dosages or
allergic reactions.
Access to care will be improved in
many underserved rural and urban communities by using health technology,
telemedicine care, and consultations. Health technology and telehealth
will offer a powerful means to improve access to mental health care in
underserved, rural, and remote areas. The privacy of personal health
information - especially in the case of mental illnesses - will be
strongly protected and controlled by consumers and families. With
appropriate privacy protection, electronic records will enable essential
medical and mental health information to be shared across the public and
private sectors.
Reimbursements will become flexible
enough to allow implementing evidence-based practices and coordinating
both traditional clinical care and e-health visits. In both the public
and private sectors, policies will change to support these innovative
approaches.
Return To Top
The privacy of personal health information - especially in the case of mental illnesses - will be strongly protected and controlled by consumers and families.
An integrated information technology
and communications infrastructure will be critical to achieving the five
preceding goals and transforming mental health care in America. To
address this technological need in the mental health care system, this
goal envisions two critical technological components:
-
A robust telehealth system to
improve access to care, and
-
An integrated health records system
and a personal health information system for providers and patients.
Return
To Top
To aid in transforming the mental
health system, the Commission makes two recommendations:
6.1 Use health technology and
telehealth to improve access and coordination of mental health care,
especially for Americans in remote areas or in underserved
populations.
6.2 Develop and implement integrated
electronic health record and personal health information systems.
Return
To Top
Preventing mental illnesses remains a
promise of the future. Granted, the best option is to avoid or delay the
onset of any illness, but the Executive Order directed the Commission to
conduct a comprehensive study of the delivery of mental health services.
The Commission recognizes that it is better to prevent an illness than
to treat it, but unmet needs and barriers to services must first be
identified to reach the millions of Americans with existing mental
illnesses who are deterred from seeking help. The barriers may exist for
a variety of reasons:
These barriers are all discussed in
this report.
Return
To Top
The Commission - aware of all the
limitations on resources - examined realigning Federal financing with a
keen awareness of the constraints. As such, the policies and
improvements recommended in this Final Report reflect policy and
program changes that make the most of existing resources by increasing
cost effectiveness and reducing unnecessary and burdensome regulatory
barriers, coupled with a strong measure of accountability. A transformed
mental health system will more wisely invest resources to provide
optimal care while making the best use of limited resources.
The process of transforming mental health care in America drives the
system toward a delivery structure that will give consumers broader
discretion in how care decisions are made. This shift will give
consumers more confidence to require that care be sensitive to their
needs, that the best available treatments and supports be available, and
that demonstrably effective technologies be widely replicated in
different settings. This confidence will then enhance cooperative
relationships with mental health care professionals who share the hope
of recovery.
|
|
|
|
Goals and Recommendations In a Transformed Mental Health System ...
|
|
Goal 1 |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Advance and implement a
national campaign to reduce the stigma of seeking care and a
national strategy for suicide prevention.
1.2 Address mental health with the same urgency as physical health.
|
|
Goal 2 |
|
|
|
|
Return To Top
2.1 Develop an individualized plan
of care for every adult with a serious mental illness and child with
a serious emotional disturbance.
2.2 Involve consumers and families fully in orienting the mental
health system toward recovery.
2.3 Align relevant Federal programs to improve access and
accountability for mental health services.
2.4 Create a Comprehensive State Mental Health Plan.
2.5 Protect and enhance the rights of people with mental illnesses.
|
|
Goal 3 |
|
|
|
|
3.1 Improve access to quality care
that is culturally competent.
3.2 Improve access to quality care in rural and geographically
remote areas.
|
|
Goal 4 |
Early Mental Health Screening,
Assessment, and Referral to Services Are Common Practice.
|
|
|
|
Return To Top
4.1 Promote the mental health of
young children.
4.2 Improve and expand school mental health programs.
4.3 Screen for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders and
link with integrated treatment strategies.
4.4 Screen for mental disorders in primary health care, across the
life span, and connect to treatment and supports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal 5 |
|
|
|
|
5.1 Accelerate research to promote
recovery and resilience, and ultimately to cure and prevent mental
illnesses.
Return To Top
5.2 Advance evidence-based
practices using dissemination and demonstration projects and create
a public-private partnership to guide their implementation.
5.3 Improve and expand the workforce providing evidence-based mental
health services and supports.
5.4 Develop the knowledge base in four understudied areas: mental
health disparities, long-term effects of medications, trauma, and
acute care.
|
|
Goal 6 |
|
|
|
|
6.1 Use health technology and
telehealth to improve access and coordination of mental health care,
especially for Americans in remote areas or in underserved
populations.
6.2 Develop and implement integrated electronic health record and
personal health information systems.
|

Footnotes:
Return
To Top
a. In this Final Report, whenever
child or children is used, it is understood that parents or guardians
should be included in the process of making choices and decisions for
minor children. This allows the family to provide support and guidance
when developing relationships with mental health professionals,
community resource representatives, teachers, and anyone else the
individual or family invites. This same support and guidance can also
include family members for individuals older than 18 years of age.
b. Functional impairment is defined as
difficulties that substantially interfere with or limit role functioning
in one or more major life activities, including basic daily living
skills (e.g., eating, bathing, dressing); instrumental living skills
(e.g., maintaining a household, managing money, getting around the
community, taking prescribed medication); and functioning in social,
family, and vocational/educational contexts (Section 1912 (c) of the
Public Health Services Act, as amended by Public Law 102?321).
Return
To Top
c. In this Final Report, consumer
identifies people who use or have used mental health services (also
known as mental health consumers, survivors, patients, or clients).
Source
|
Return To Top
President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
|
Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America
|
|
Federal Register
Vol. 67, No. 86
Friday, May 3, 2002 |
PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
|
|
Title 3 -- |
Executive Order 13263 of April 29, 2002
|
|
The President |
President's New Freedom Commission on Mental
Health
|
|
|
Return To Top
By the authority vested in me as President by
the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and
to improve America's mental health service delivery system for
individuals with serious mental illness and children with serious
emotional disturbances, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Establishment. There is hereby established the
President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (Commission).
Sec. 2. Membership. (a) The Commission's
membership shall be composed of:
Return To Top
(i) Not more than fifteen members appointed
by the President, including providers, payers, administrators, and
consumers of mental health services and family members of
consumers; and
(ii) Not more than seven ex officio members,
four of whom shall be designated by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, and the remaining three of whom shall be
designated--one each--by the Secretaries of the Departments of
Labor, Education, and Veterans Affairs.
(b) The President shall designate a Chair
from among the fifteen members of the Commission appointed by the
President.
Return To Top
Sec. 3. Mission. The mission of the
Commission shall be to conduct a comprehensive study of the United
States mental health service delivery system, including public and
private sector providers, and to advise the President on methods of
improving the system. The Commission's goal shall be to recommend
improvements to enable adults with serious mental illness and
children with serious emotional disturbances to live, work, learn,
and participate fully in their communities. In carrying out its
mission, the Commission shall, at a minimum:
(a) Review the current quality and
effectiveness of public and private providers and Federal, State,
and local government involvement in the delivery of services to
individuals with serious mental illnesses and children with
serious emotional disturbances, and identify unmet needs and
barriers to services.
(b) Identify innovative mental health
treatments, services, and technologies that are demonstrably
effective and can be widely replicated in different settings.
(c) Formulate policy options that could be
implemented by public and private providers, and Federal, State,
and local governments to integrate the use of effective treatments
and services, improve coordination among service providers, and
improve community integration for adults with serious mental
illnesses and children with serious emotional disturbances.
Return To Top
Sec. 4. Principles. In conducting i | |